Sources & Methodology

This page documents how factual assertions, timelines, and interpretive framings are compiled, validated, and maintained for transparency and reproducibility.

1. Source Taxonomy

2. Verification Workflow

  1. Extraction: Collect candidate data points (date, instrument, clause, procedural step).
  2. Primary Anchor Check: Confirm each data point against a primary legal document.
  3. Secondary Corroboration: Cross-match with at least one independent reputable source (judgment summary, parliamentary record).
  4. Contextual Framing: Annotate whether a statement is descriptive (observable fact) or interpretive (analytical abstraction).
  5. Integration: Insert into hierarchical section with anchor ID and cross‑references.

3. Consolidation Pipeline

Information flows from raw extraction notes → provisional staging list → validated canonical timeline / thematic section. Redundant or low-salience items are merged into aggregated descriptors (e.g., multiple similar adaptation orders referenced collectively).

4. Update Cadence

5. Inclusion Criteria

6. Citation & Referencing

7. Quality Controls

8. Limitations

Some transitional administrative directives may lack persistent archival endpoints; such items are flagged or excluded to avoid unverifiable references. Interpretive framings reflect synthesized scholarly consensus trends but are not prescriptive policy positions.

9. Feedback & Corrections

Suggested corrections or missing source notifications: editor@article370.com. Please include source citation and section anchor reference.

Cross-Reference: AboutTermsPrivacy