Sources & Methodology
This page documents how factual assertions, timelines, and interpretive framings are compiled, validated, and maintained for transparency and reproducibility.
1. Source Taxonomy
- Primary Constitutional & Legal Texts: Constitution of India provisions, Presidential Orders, Reorganisation Act text.
- Judicial Material: Supreme Court judgments, interim orders, cause lists for procedural chronology.
- Legislative & Executive Documents: Parliamentary debates, Gazette notifications, ministry press releases.
- Comparative & Scholarly: Peer‑reviewed articles, constitutional law monographs, federalism analyses.
- Secondary Context: Credible news reports (used for sequencing context only, not doctrinal substantiation).
2. Verification Workflow
- Extraction: Collect candidate data points (date, instrument, clause, procedural step).
- Primary Anchor Check: Confirm each data point against a primary legal document.
- Secondary Corroboration: Cross-match with at least one independent reputable source (judgment summary, parliamentary record).
- Contextual Framing: Annotate whether a statement is descriptive (observable fact) or interpretive (analytical abstraction).
- Integration: Insert into hierarchical section with anchor ID and cross‑references.
3. Consolidation Pipeline
Information flows from raw extraction notes → provisional staging list → validated canonical timeline / thematic section. Redundant or low-salience items are merged into aggregated descriptors (e.g., multiple similar adaptation orders referenced collectively).
4. Update Cadence
- Scheduled: Quarterly baseline review cycle scanning for new legal developments.
- Event-Driven: Immediate insertion queue for landmark judgments, statutory amendments, or domicile/land policy circulars.
- Version Notes: Material revisions flagged via page-level version note (and planned aggregated changelog feed).
5. Inclusion Criteria
- Relevance: Directly clarifies Article 370’s legal mechanism, operational history, or abrogation pathway.
- Traceable: Must map to a primary or high-quality secondary source.
- Non-Redundant: Adds resolution not already represented by broader synthesis statements.
6. Citation & Referencing
- Legal Documents: Cited by instrument name + date (e.g., C.O. 272 / 05 Aug 2019).
- Judgments: Cited by full case name (short form after first mention) + decision date; neutral citation if available.
- Scholarly Works: Author Surname (Year) abbreviated parenthetical; full reference in a consolidated bibliography (planned).
- News / Reports: Used sparingly for sequencing—excluded from doctrinal substantiation where primary texts suffice.
7. Quality Controls
- Consistency Pass: Terminology alignment (e.g., “abrogation” vs “termination” context-specific usage).
- Anchor Integrity: Periodic crawl script (planned) to detect broken internal anchors.
- Temporal Accuracy: Chronological ordering cross-checked with multi-source date confirmation.
8. Limitations
Some transitional administrative directives may lack persistent archival endpoints; such items are flagged or excluded to avoid unverifiable references. Interpretive framings reflect synthesized scholarly consensus trends but are not prescriptive policy positions.
9. Feedback & Corrections
Suggested corrections or missing source notifications: editor@article370.com. Please include source citation and section anchor reference.